The New era of control: Can Iraq’s free press survive its politically-tainted rulers?


Shafaq News

Iraq enters 2026 under a new parliament
shaped by dominant political blocs, and the country confronts a critical test:
whether the next four years will bring meaningful protection for journalists or
a tightening of long-standing political and legal pressures.

International indicators offer a deceptive
snapshot of progress. The 2025 Reporters Without Borders index places Iraq at
155th worldwide—an improvement from 169 in 2024 and 172 in 2023—yet these
numbers mask a more troubling reality visible on the ground. Over 340
journalists have been killed across three decades, according to the Strategic
Center for Human Rights, whose head, Fadel Al-Gharawi, underscored that Iraq
remains one of the world’s most dangerous environments for media workers.

The contradiction between global rankings
and daily risks sets the stage for a deeper question: how will the political
winners of the 2025 elections influence the future of journalism in Iraq, given
their historical patterns of restricting media freedoms?

Lawsuits Are Power

Understanding the implications for
journalists requires examining the trajectory of the political forces that
secured the largest gains in the latest elections. The Reconstruction and
Development bloc (Al-Ima’ar Wal Tanmiya), led by caretaker Prime Minister
Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani, emerged with the strongest parliamentary presence. But
this rise comes with a documented record of legal pressure on the media.

Over the past three years, Al-Sudani filed
11 personal lawsuits against journalists and commentators, while government
bodies filed dozens more. Violations in 2024 alone exceeded 460 cases—higher
even than the turbulent years following the 2019 protests—and included actions
such as blocking prominent outlets like Ultra Iraq.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, an
independent Baghdad journalist told Shafaq News, how pressure extends beyond
the courtroom, explaining that political actors influence digital platforms,
exert pressure on media institutions, and create an environment where
journalism becomes a daily risk.

The State of Law coalition (E’tilaf Dawlat
Al-Qanoun), led by former PM Nouri Al-Maliki, also maintains a long-standing
reputation for restricting the press. Al-Maliki filed six lawsuits against
journalists during his tenure, while overall violations between 2005 and 2014
surpassed 2,000 documented cases, ranging from raids and forced closures to
physical assaults.

In just the last two years of his
premiership, more than 500 incidents were recorded. A defining moment came in
April 2013, when ten satellite channels were shut down simultaneously following
the Hawija events—a decisive demonstration of the state’s willingness to impose
coordinated censorship.

At the provincial level, similar patterns
emerged. In Al-Anbar, the Progress (Taqaddum) Party, headed by former
parliament speaker Mohammed Al-Halbousi, leveraged its influence to shape
public narrative, most notably when school principal and poet Ahmed Zakrut was
relocated after reciting a poem criticizing public services in 2021.

In 2019, activist Samir Faraj was arrested
for expressing political views, while journalists investigating corruption or
administrative failures faced threats.

In the Kurdistan Region, media workers who
exposed corruption or political dominance were sometimes accused of espionage
or detained under expansive security laws. Parties such as the Sadiqoon
Movement and Badr Organization were also repeatedly linked to intimidation
against journalists probing misconduct or criticizing officials.

The sum of these examples illustrates a
nationwide pattern that political power
has routinely translated into pressure on journalists.

Read more: Iraq’s vague Protest Law: A tool for control or a framework for rights?

Morals, Not Rights

Despite constitutional guarantees
protecting freedom of expression and peaceful assembly, Iraq’s legal system
continues to rely on restrictive provisions, particularly those within the 1969
Penal Code.

Broad terms such as “public morals” and
“public order” remain frequently invoked to intimidate journalists, while
proposed amendments threaten to impose severe penalties—including life
sentences—for online content deemed harmful to unity, economic interests, or
national security. These vaguely defined categories create fertile ground for
selective prosecution, reinforcing self-censorship as a survival strategy.

A pivotal development occurred in August
2025, when this parliament—whose term concluded on November 11—revived a
contentious draft law that had stalled since 2023. The original bill was titled
the Law on Freedom of Expression, Assembly, and Peaceful Demonstration. But in
its revived form, all references to “freedom of expression” and the “right to
knowledge” were removed from both the title and its articles.

Legal experts view this omission as a
deliberate narrowing of the bill’s purpose, excluding protections that once
formed the core of the legislation.

Although the draft includes a clause
allowing journalists to cover demonstrations freely and seek compensation for
physical or material harm, legal specialists argue that such guarantees are
overshadowed by deeper structural concerns.

Speaking to Shafaq News, legal expert Ali
al-Tamimi stressed that the draft contains at least 17 fundamental legal flaws,
requiring complete reconstruction. He further pointed to Article 38 of the
Iraqi constitution, which guarantees freedom of expression and peaceful
assembly—protections that, in his view, the current draft undermines rather
than upholds.

Moreover, political analyst Mujashaa
al-Tamimi warned that vague terms like “public order” and “morality” could
easily be weaponized to suppress dissent, cautioning that, without strong
safeguards, such language becomes a tool to silence citizens rather than
protect them.

Truth Goes Informal

Simultaneously, debate over the pending
Right to Information Law has become a focal point of concern. The Strategic
Center for Human Rights warned that the expected amendments may sharply
restrict journalists’ access to official documents—changes that would push
reporters toward informal channels, complicate verification, heighten legal
exposure, and make investigative work increasingly perilous.

These legal uncertainties intersect with
the broader realities of Iraq’s media economy. Politically affiliated outlets
operate with steady funding and institutional protection, while independent
platforms face chronic financial instability, limited advertising
opportunities, and recurring closures. This imbalance leaves independent
journalism structurally vulnerable at the exact moment when scrutiny of public
institutions is most needed.

Digital media initially seemed to counter
these constraints by expanding the space for alternative voices, yet it now
confronts sustained monitoring and political pressure. Content judged offensive
to national or religious symbols is routinely removed, and reporters covering
corruption or political influence endure cyberattacks, threats, abduction
attempts, and physical assault.

The Al-Nakheel Center for Rights and Press
Freedoms captured the daily atmosphere: fear not only of lawsuits but of
anonymous messages and direct pressure on media institutions—pressures felt
most acutely by younger journalists lacking institutional protection.

Regional indicators further illuminate
Iraq’s uneasy position. Tunisia ranks 118, followed by Morocco at 129, Lebanon
130, Kuwait 131, Jordan 132, and Oman 137. The UAE stands at 160, Saudi Arabia
166, Egypt 170, Bahrain 173, and Syria 179.

Lebanon, despite its political volatility,
sustains comparatively broader room for independent media through stronger
institutional safeguards. Gulf States, by contrast, employ highly structured
legal and security controls.

Iraq sits uncomfortably between the two
models—exposed to legal and security pressures yet without robust institutions
capable of shielding journalists. This combination helps explain why modest
improvements in international rankings have not translated into genuine safety.

Read more: The Fine Print of Freedom: Iraq to amend Freedom of Expression and Peaceful Assembly Law

Written and edited by Shafaq News staff.


Source

Visited 1 times, 1 visit(s) today

Recommended For You

Avatar photo

About the Author: News Hound